沈明焱. 金融借款合同中利息的司法规制[J]. 华北电力大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 4(3): 76-84. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2023.03.009
引用本文: 沈明焱. 金融借款合同中利息的司法规制[J]. 华北电力大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 4(3): 76-84. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2023.03.009
SHEN Ming-yan. Judicial Regulation of Interest in Financial Loan Contract[J]. JOURNAL OF NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCES), 2023, 4(3): 76-84. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2023.03.009
Citation: SHEN Ming-yan. Judicial Regulation of Interest in Financial Loan Contract[J]. JOURNAL OF NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCES), 2023, 4(3): 76-84. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2023.03.009

金融借款合同中利息的司法规制

Judicial Regulation of Interest in Financial Loan Contract

  • 摘要: 金融借款合同与民间借贷合同存在主体、受管制程度等方面的区别,且前者更重合同双方而非借款人一方的利益,委托借款合同不属于金融借款合同。对金融借款合同的利息规制既要考虑到对意思自治、公平原则的维护,也要考虑到金融服务实体经济的需要。在利息管制方式上,应重视利息总量的控制,而非对利息构成进行调整。具体体现为金融借款合同中可以在利息总量下就罚息计收复利,该利息总量上限仍应参照民间借贷的规定加以确定。

     

    Abstract: There are differences between financial loan contracts and private lending contracts in terms of subject matter and degree of control, and the former places more emphasis on the interests of both parties to the contract rather than the borrower. The contract of entrusted borrowing is not a financial borrowing contract. The regulation of interest on financial loan contracts should take into account both the maintenance of the principle of autonomy and fairness, and the need for financial services for the real economy. In the way of interest regulation, attention should be paid to the control of the total amount of interest, rather than the adjustment of the composition of interest. This is reflected in the fact that compound interest can be charged on the penalty interest under the total amount of interest in the financial loan contract. This total interest cap should still be determined by reference to the regulations on private lending.

     

/

返回文章
返回