张骞. 智慧课堂语境下大学思政教学改革的反思哈贝马斯交往理论的一种解读[J]. 华北电力大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 3(4): 132-140. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2022.04.015
引用本文: 张骞. 智慧课堂语境下大学思政教学改革的反思哈贝马斯交往理论的一种解读[J]. 华北电力大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 3(4): 132-140. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2022.04.015
ZHANG Qian. Reflections on the Reform of Ideological and Political Education in Universities in Smart Classroom[J]. JOURNAL OF NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCES), 2022, 3(4): 132-140. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2022.04.015
Citation: ZHANG Qian. Reflections on the Reform of Ideological and Political Education in Universities in Smart Classroom[J]. JOURNAL OF NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCES), 2022, 3(4): 132-140. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2022.04.015

智慧课堂语境下大学思政教学改革的反思哈贝马斯交往理论的一种解读

Reflections on the Reform of Ideological and Political Education in Universities in Smart Classroom

  • 摘要: 大学思政课教学改革因“智慧课堂”等大数据技术的全面介入而受到在校大学生的追捧和年轻教师的欢迎,学生却在利用大数据参与教学的同时产生了传统师生伦理的异化、教学交往的行为失范以及“数据人”对自我呈现的迎合与解构。哈贝马斯“交往理性”对于技术合理化的批判为避免“主客二元”对立结构对于大数据技术的排斥提供了理论和实践基础——“话语伦理”的建构营造良好师生交往环境;交往理性语境下实现学生情感教育的观照;人文校园的重建发现智慧范畴。面向未来,唯有警惕教育对技术的臣服;明确界定技术与教育融合的底线;始终以激发主体活力为价值旨归,大学思政课的教学改革才能真正落脚于教育现代化的本质,回归人的现代化。

     

    Abstract: The teaching reform of ideological and political courses in universities has been sought after by college students and welcomed by young teachers due to the full intervention of big data technologies such as “smart classrooms.” The behavioral anomie of teaching communication and the “data man”’s catering and deconstruction of self-presentation. Habermas’s “Communicational Reason”’s criticism of technology rationalization provides a theoretical and practical basis for avoiding the rejection of big data technology by the “subject and object duality” structure-the construction of “discourse ethics” creates a good communication environment between teachers and students. Students’ emotional education can be realized in a rational context, and the reconstruction of the humanistic campus discovers the category of wisdom. In the future, only by being vigilant about education’s surrender to technology, clearly defining the bottom line of the integration of technology and education, and always aiming at stimulating the vitality of the subject, can the teaching reform of university ideological and political courses truly follow the essence of educational modernization and return to humanity. Modernize.

     

/

返回文章
返回