姜子豪. 论人工智能的主体性地位[J]. 华北电力大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 3(5): 17-23. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2022.05.003
引用本文: 姜子豪. 论人工智能的主体性地位[J]. 华北电力大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 3(5): 17-23. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2022.05.003
JIANG Zi-hao. On the Subjectivity Status of Artificial IntelligenceBased on the Perspective of Marxism[J]. JOURNAL OF NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCES), 2022, 3(5): 17-23. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2022.05.003
Citation: JIANG Zi-hao. On the Subjectivity Status of Artificial IntelligenceBased on the Perspective of Marxism[J]. JOURNAL OF NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCES), 2022, 3(5): 17-23. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2022.05.003

论人工智能的主体性地位

On the Subjectivity Status of Artificial IntelligenceBased on the Perspective of Marxism

  • 摘要: 自达特茅斯会议提出“人工智能”一词后,经过五六十年的发展,人工智能达到了一个新的高度。越来越多的学者开始担心“奇点”的来临,那时人工智能可能会超越人类智能,进而威胁人类的主体性地位。但是,基于马克思主义主体性视角看,人工智能无法获得主体性地位。从自我意识角度看,人工智能不具备自由意志;从“类”的角度看,人工智能不能自由自在的活动;从实践的角度看,人工智能无法进行感受性的活动。这些表明人工智能很难获得真正的主体性地位,进而不会威胁人类的主体性地位,因为主体性是人在社会实践活动中表现出来的属性,是人所特有的属性。

     

    Abstract: Since the Dartmouth Conference put forward the word “artificial intelligence”, after 50 or 60 years of development, artificial intelligence (AI) has reached a new height. A growing number of scholars are beginning to worry about the “singularity”, when artificial intelligence could overtake human intelligence and threaten human subjectivity. However, from the perspective of Marxist subjectivity, AI cannot obtain the status of subjectivity. From the perspective of self-consciousness, AI does not have free will. From the perspective of “class”, artificial intelligence cannot act freely. From a practical point of view, AI cannot perform sensory activities. These show that it is difficult for AI to obtain the real subjectivity status, and cannot threaten the subjectivity status of human beings, because subjectivity is the attribute that human beings show in social practice activities, and is a unique attribute of human beings.

     

/

返回文章
返回