郭展义. 关于马克思“道德悖论”问题的几点辨析[J]. 华北电力大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 4(1): 10-16. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2023.01.017
引用本文: 郭展义. 关于马克思“道德悖论”问题的几点辨析[J]. 华北电力大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 4(1): 10-16. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2023.01.017
GUO Zhan-yi. Some Discriminations on Marx’s “Moral Paradox”[J]. JOURNAL OF NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCES), 2023, 4(1): 10-16. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2023.01.017
Citation: GUO Zhan-yi. Some Discriminations on Marx’s “Moral Paradox”[J]. JOURNAL OF NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCES), 2023, 4(1): 10-16. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2023.01.017

关于马克思“道德悖论”问题的几点辨析

Some Discriminations on Marx’s “Moral Paradox”

  • 摘要: 分析马克思主义运用分析哲学和元伦理学方法解读马克思文本,围绕马克思理论体系是否存在道德因素或马克思是否是非道德主义者展开激烈争论,并试图构建一种“合理的”道德理论。它的解读因严格“二分法”和方法论个人主义的局限而陷入一个似是而非的马克思“道德悖论”问题之中。穿越马克思文本,以及超越西方道德形而上学传统和现代分析哲学、元伦理学方法这两种抽象,可以有力辨析它的方法、观点和论据,消解马克思“道德悖论”问题,从而呈现真实的马克思道德理论。

     

    Abstract: Analytical Marxism uses analytic philosophy and metaethics to interpret Marx’s texts, debates on whether there is a moral element in Marx’s theoretical system or whether Marx is an anti-moralist, and attempts to construct a “reasonable” moral theory. Its interpretation is mired in a plausible Marxist “moral paradox” because of the limitations of strict “dichotomies” and methodological individualism. Through Marx’s text and beyond the two different abstractions of Western moral metaphysics tradition and modern analytic philosophy and meta-ethical methods, we can vigorously analyze its methods, viewpoints, and arguments, so as to eliminate Marx’s “moral paradox” problem and present the true Marx's moral theory.

     

/

返回文章
返回