李小军. 中国核电“走出去”的“敌意风险”:多维逻辑与治理路径[J]. 华北电力大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 3(6): 34-41. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2022.06.004
引用本文: 李小军. 中国核电“走出去”的“敌意风险”:多维逻辑与治理路径[J]. 华北电力大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 3(6): 34-41. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2022.06.004
LI Xiao-jun. “Hostile Risk” of “Going Out” of China’s Nuclear Power: Multidimensional Logic and Governance Path[J]. JOURNAL OF NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCES), 2022, 3(6): 34-41. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2022.06.004
Citation: LI Xiao-jun. “Hostile Risk” of “Going Out” of China’s Nuclear Power: Multidimensional Logic and Governance Path[J]. JOURNAL OF NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCES), 2022, 3(6): 34-41. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2022.06.004

中国核电“走出去”的“敌意风险”:多维逻辑与治理路径

“Hostile Risk” of “Going Out” of China’s Nuclear Power: Multidimensional Logic and Governance Path

  • 摘要: 核电“走出去”不可避免会引致针对我国核电的过敏性、歧视性、排斥性和破坏性的各类敌意风险。“锚定效应”下的“核过敏”、“核邻避情结”触发下的反核抗议、相对剥夺感产生的“核排斥”、标签理论视角下的“核双标”是“敌意风险”发生的多重理论逻辑。建立国际化的专职攻关团队,提升民众对核电的信任度和接受度,是核电顺利落地的前提和基础;提升中国标准在国际核电市场上的话语权和竞争力,是突破西方技术壁垒和消解西方“核双标”思维的关键举措;推进全球核安全治理,努力构建核电安全人类命运共同体是化解“敌意风险”的根本路径。

     

    Abstract: The “going out” of nuclear power will inevitably lead to all kinds of hostile risks which are allergic, discriminatory, repulsive and destructive to China’s nuclear power. The nuclear allergy under the anchoring effect, the anti-nuclear protest triggered by the nuclear neighborhood complex, the nuclear rejection caused by the relative deprivation, and the nuclear double standard under labeling theory’s perspective are the multiple theoretical logics of the hostile risk. Establishing an international full-time research team to enhance people’s trust and acceptance of nuclear power is the premise and foundation for the successful landing of nuclear power. Improving the discourse power and competitiveness of Chinese standards in the international nuclear power market is a key measure to break through the western technical barriers and dispel the western “nuclear double standard” thinking. Promoting global nuclear safety governance and striving to build a nuclear safety Community of Shared Future for Mankind are the fundamental ways to resolve “hostile risks”.

     

/

返回文章
返回