黄晋, 毕凡. 劳务派遣同工同酬条款适用困境与反思[J]. 华北电力大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 3(3): 94-102. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2022.03.010
引用本文: 黄晋, 毕凡. 劳务派遣同工同酬条款适用困境与反思[J]. 华北电力大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 3(3): 94-102. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2022.03.010
HUANG Jin, BI Fan. Dilemma and Reflection on the Application of Equal Pay Clause in Labor Dispatch[J]. JOURNAL OF NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCES), 2022, 3(3): 94-102. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2022.03.010
Citation: HUANG Jin, BI Fan. Dilemma and Reflection on the Application of Equal Pay Clause in Labor Dispatch[J]. JOURNAL OF NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCES), 2022, 3(3): 94-102. DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2022.03.010

劳务派遣同工同酬条款适用困境与反思

Dilemma and Reflection on the Application of Equal Pay Clause in Labor Dispatch

  • 摘要: “同工不同酬”是劳务派遣过程中出现的热点问题。为了规避同工同酬,用工单位采取在奖金、补贴和津贴上设置差异,甚者是不给予派遣劳动者合理工资调整机制方式来规避同工同酬。派遣劳动者在通过司法途径进行权利救济的过程中,除了被要求过重的举证责任之外,法院在审判过程中还呈现,诸如强调用工单位的企业经营权、工资自主决定权;重视劳雇双方对工资的约定;限缩“同酬”的范围等倾向,从而导致劳动者同工同酬的诉求得不到支持。从诉讼代理人的角度,一方面,通过仲裁庭要求用工单位提供相关证据或是要求法院依职权调查取证。另一方面,在代理意见中对法院庭审倾向透过相关法理、法规予以辩驳从而力求得到法庭的支持。前述方法是为破除现有困境之路径。

     

    Abstract: "Different pay for equal work" is a hot issue in the process of dispatching labor. In order to avoid equal pay for equal work, employing units adopt differences in bonuses and allowances. What is more, they do not give dispatched workers reasonable wage adjustment mechanism to avoid equal pay for equal work. In the process of sending workers through the judicial channels for relief of rights, in addition to being asked for excessive burden of proof during the trial, the court also presented, for example, the right of self-decision, the right of management and the right to wage independently. Besides, the court empasized the wage agreement between the two sides and limited the scope of "equal pay". As a result, the demands of workers for equal pay for equal work cannot be supported. From the perspective of litigation agent, on the one hand, the arbitration tribunal requires the employing unit to provide relevant evidence or the court to investigate and collect evidence ex officio; on the other hand, in the agency opinion, the court tends to refute the court trial through relevant legal principles and regulations, so as to strive to get the support of the court. The above-mentioned method is a way to get rid of the existing dilemma.

     

/

返回文章
返回