标识性视角下扎实推进共同富裕话语体系建构论析

Constructing a discourse system for solidly promoting common prosperity from an iconic perspective

  • 摘要: 共同富裕话语体系是中华民族集体思想意识和行动的系统呈现,基于标识性视角,深刻剖析共同富裕话语体系建构的多重面向,对讲好共同富裕的中国故事和摆脱国际舆论场“话语赤字”具有一定增进和补充价值。从标识性概念看,人的发展超越“物”的配置是推进共同富裕的重心转向,建构扎实推进共同富裕的话语体系需用生活性话语替代理论性话语,自觉创设“文本—图像”融合叙事方式。在标识性范畴上,“传统—现代”的深度融合是共同富裕生成本土性的确证,建构共同富裕话语体系需要推动模糊性认知具象化、灵活应用线性与非线性交互叙事。在标识性表述上,共同富裕话语体系的建构需要统合话语表述层次、表述功能和话语表述样态,重点坚持基础性话语与核心性话语有机统一、目标性话语与原则性话语协同联动、价值性话语与制度性话语相互融通。

     

    Abstract: The discourse system of common prosperity is a systematic presentation of the collective ideological consciousness and action of the Chinese nation. Based on a symbolic perspective, this paper deeply analyzes the multiple aspects of constructing the discourse system of common prosperity, which has certain promotion and supplementary value for telling the story of China's common prosperity well and overcoming the discourse deficit in the international public opinion field. From the perspective of symbolic concepts, human development transcends the allocation of "things" and is a shift in the focus of promoting common prosperity. To construct a solid discourse system for promoting common prosperity, it is necessary to replace theoretical discourse with everyday discourse and consciously create a "text image" integrated narrative approach. In terms of symbolic categories, the deep integration of "tradition modernity" is a confirmation of the localization of common prosperity. Constructing a discourse system for common prosperity requires promoting the concretization of vague cognition and the flexible application of linear and nonlinear interactive narratives. In terms of symbolic expression, the construction of the discourse system for common prosperity requires the integration of discourse expression levels, expression functions, and discourse expression patterns, with a focus on the organic unity of basic discourse and core discourse, the coordinated linkage between target discourse and principle discourse, and the integration of value discourse and institutional discourse.

     

/

返回文章
返回