论土地复垦监管行为协同治理的现代化要义

On the Modernization of Collaborative Governance of Land Reclamation Supervision Behavior

  • 摘要: 土地复垦监管行为规范既是全面推进乡村振兴维度下深化农村土地制度改革的基础规范指引,也是在该微观领域印证、反思土地治理行为所涉“自然资源监管”之相关“环境治理”行为共同体水平的必要制度载体。可基于“协同治理”这一理论范式指引,尝试在土地复垦监管领域建构起更加符合中国式农业农村现代化的合作模式。土地复垦监管行为协同治理的践行领域主要涉及目标导向和阻滞障碍两个方面,其为协同治理理论引入提供了可行性论证,堪称土地复垦监管行为协同治理的“可行性要义”;土地复垦监管行为协同治理的利害关系人主要涉及主体结构和参与素质两个方面,其为协同治理理论实施提供了现实性基础,堪称土地复垦监管行为协同治理的“现实性要义”;土地复垦监管行为协同治理的合作意愿主要涉及利益导向和检视载体两个方面,其为协同治理理论运用提供了制度化建议,堪称土地复垦监管行为协同治理的“期许性要义”。

     

    Abstract: The regulatory behavior norms for land reclamation are not only the basic normative guidance for deepening rural land system reform under the dimension of comprehensive promotion of rural revitalization, but also the necessary institutional carrier for confirming and reflecting on the community level of "environmental governance" behavior related to "natural resource supervision" involved in land governance behavior in this micro field. Based on the theoretical paradigm of "collaborative governance", an attempt can be made to construct a cooperative model in the field of land reclamation supervision that is more in line with the modernization of Chinese style agriculture and rural areas. The practice field of collaborative governance of land reclamation regulatory behavior mainly involves goal orientation and hindrance, which provide feasibility proof for the introduction of collaborative governance theory and can be called the "feasible essence" of collaborative governance of land reclamation regulatory behavior. The stakeholders in the collaborative governance of land reclamation regulatory behavior mainly involve subject structure and participation quality, which provide a practical basis for the implementation of collaborative governance theory and can be called the "practical essence" of collaborative governance of land reclamation regulatory behavior. The willingness to cooperate in collaborative governance of land reclamation regulatory behavior mainly involves interest orientation and inspection carrier. It provides institutionalized suggestions for the application of collaborative governance theory and can be called the "expected essence" of collaborative governance of land reclamation regulatory behavior.

     

/

返回文章
返回