马克思《博士论文》的背景性考察及自由观问题对“自我意识”哲学的一种批判性复兴

A Contextualization of Marx's Doctoral Dissertation and the Problem of the Freedom ConceptA Critical Revival of the Philosophy of Self-Consciousness

  • 摘要: “三月革命前时期”(Vormärz)是德国历史上的一个特殊时期,这一时期是德国自由被严重束缚的时代。它与希腊化时期在社会历史与思想上具有一定的错时空相似,这种相似性使得“自我意识”成为当时知识分子的思想源泉,并成为青年黑格尔派思想家们趋之若鹜的概念。同时,黑格尔学派解体则为代表自由的自我意识提供了高扬的土壤,进而为马克思对自我意识哲学进行研究提供了理论契机。在这样的背景下,深受青年黑格尔派影响的马克思精准地把握时代脉搏,在其《博士论文》中对希腊化时期的两位原子论哲学家进行了深入的对比,解答了自由如何在“自我意识”哲学中成为可能,以及自由如何实现等问题。虽然,40年代早期的马克思也正处于思想转变时期,但是与鲍威尔等“自我意识”哲学家不同的是,此时马克思在“自我意识”的具体规定性、思维与存在、哲学与现实的关系上提出了独特的见解,从而形成了具有马克思主义雏形的自由思想,这是马克思在自由被束缚的时代的思考与呐喊,也是马克思对唯物主义的最初关切。

     

    Abstract: The "Vormärz" is a special period in German history, a time when German freedom was severely restricted. It is similar to the Hellenistic period in terms of social history and ideology, and this similarity makes "self-consciousness" a source of intellectual thought and a concept that the young Hegelian thinkers were attracted to, while the dissolution of the Hegelian school provided the soil for the exaltation of self-consciousness, which represents freedom, and in turn, provided a theoretical opportunity for the Marx's study of the philosophy of self-consciousness. Against this background, Marx, who was deeply influenced by the Young Hegelians, accurately grasped the pulse of the times, and in his Doctoral Dissertation made an in-depth comparison between the two anatomist in the Hellenistic period, and answered the questions of how freedom was possible in the philosophy of "self-consciousness" and how freedom could be realized. Although Marx was also in a period of ideological transformation in the early 1940s, unlike Bruno Bauer and other "self-conscious" philosophers, Marx put forward unique insights into the specificity of "self-consciousness", the relationship between thought and existence, and philosophy and reality. This is Marx's thinking and shouting in the era when freedom was bound, and also Marx's initial concern for materialism.

     

/

返回文章
返回